Picture the situation…A new writer has spent a year writing a novel then, once deciding it is ‘ready’, has knocked up a quick query and synopsis and sent the book out to ten publishers. Three months later the writer is sitting on ten rejections and decides that self publishing is the way to go.
Before any writer splashes out their own money on publishing their own book, they should first consider just why traditional publishers have passed up on the opportunity to publish.
A novel can get rejected for many reasons:
It is not good enough: This is by far the most common reason for a book getting rejected. The writing or plot or character development or grammar or overall structure or pace or (could be a number of things) simply are not up to publishable standard. Publishers will work with writers to a certain extent in an attempt to improve a novel but if it is too much work then the book will simply be rejected.
Poor query or submission A writer can spend years writing a novel but then wants to knock out a query and synopsis in hours. There are tons of resources on the internet to help writers prepare a decent submission package. Yet, many writers still simply include a query letter that says ‘please read my extract’ and a synopsis that is just a straight description of the plot. Poor query and synopsis will equal rejection. Publishers are just too busy.
No market: If a publisher is going to take on your book, then they must believe they can sell enough books to cover printing costs, pre-printing costs (editing etc) and any advance they pay. It is not uncommon for a publisher to reject a book because they feel they can’t sell enough to break even.
It is not differently different: Publishers realise that selling books is tough and being ‘like Harry Potter’ is not enough for a book to do well. In a publisher’s eyes books need to be differently different from their other titles. By this I mean that need to be similar enough to fit a genre but different enough to stand alone in the market as something unusual and unique.
Wrong publisher: Finally it might be that your book has simply been pitched to the wrong publisher. Each publishing house has its own specialities and if your book falls outside their list it will be rejected, even if it ticks all the other boxes.
So, the question any wrier that has been rejected must ask themselves before considering self publication is why was I rejected? It may be that you have a masterpiece on your hands, but it may also be the case that you have a novel that needs more work or whose market is too small to make it worthwhile or is just not differently different enough to appeal. Is self publishing really the best option?